1 single vote - It doesn't seem like much, but how much does it matter?
On a community board with 7 members, the quorum is 4 and 5 show up. You thought all the issues of the day were covered, but a member brought up an issue - it doesn't matter what the issue was, but your vote, because of absence was not counted.
Recounts are a part of the electoral process. Ward 4 has 11 candidates, and in discussions with any candidate, no one is confident, nor is any admitting defeat. This ward is open, and of the 11, I feel 7 have a good chance of winning (I picked that number out of a hat).
On City council, there are 15 votes. Too many results are 8-7 or 7-6 - How much does one vote count?
Over the past two civic elections, recounts have been required in more than one ward. How much is 1 vote worth?
If you really think that your vote does not count, I hope you change your mind. Monday, for Ward 4, is a turning point for the community. There will be a new representative at City Hall. If you believe that you will not have a say, I challenge you to vote. Your say, and your input is required to make this area of Calgary the most important to the citizens that matter - You. It does not matter what your issue is - if you do not vote, you have no say.
Please vote on Monday, and vote for the candidate that is going to bring your voice to City Hall.
Curtis' Blog Spot - Just my points of view.
Saturday, October 16, 2010
Friday, October 15, 2010
Vote Calgary sponsored ALL Candidate forum (Alderman)
Well, here we go - three days, and as the Mayoral race heats up, ward 4 chugs along with 11 candidates all pushing for the finish line.
I attended an all alderman forum on Wednesday, and our question (for the candidates in ward 4) was the following. My answer is also below. We were given 90 seconds, and the time limit was restrictive in getting the point across, however, I did try.
The City is promoting more active mobility choices like cycling, transit and walking as alternatives to a car, particularly to those that live on primary transit routes like Centre Street. Would you support reducing parking requirements for new development to further encourage and support these lifestyle options?
Ward 4 has a blend of Inner Suburbs (Highland/Greenview), Established communities (Huntington, Thorncliffe, Sandstone, MacEwan), and New communities (Hidden Valley and Country Hills). My goal will be to discuss, evaluate, and harmonize the needs of the few to blend and create the needs of the many.
With each new development come many challenges.
#1 – Create an area where people want to live, not need to live.
#2 – Make sure it is a part of the Calgary Pathway System.
#3 – Make sure the residents have the residential parking they require.
#4 – Create a balance of Small, Medium, and high density population where the residents are satisfied in their choice of home.
#5 – Make sure they have the feeder transit (initially), and community & commuter transit (Permanent) after the area has been populated. (mostly by dual income, dual car families)
If a home has a double garage, I believe, that there should be at least one street space available per home. (Do you ever have guests?).
I believe that if there is parking close to a feeder transit route (near a park or a green space), the residents, and possibly even not the residents will use it so they can wait in their car (usually idling) for the next bus, and then hop out (after all, occasionally, it gets cold in this city) for convenience and no parking fee. This is a safety issue – think back to the playgrounds of old – we were always taught – don’t run between parked cars – well, if the space is available today, near a feeder transit route, it will be used. Look at Edgemont Blvd and John Laurie (right next to a green space and park) – The city provided “Resident Parking Only” signs do not seem to have any effect.
The solution is not to eliminate parking, but restrict it. Whether it be permit or time limits, these areas are vital to the community. If the park is on a main thoroughfare or the BLVD/Drive that connects the community – eventually, snow removal will be a priority. The next solution is provide effective transit. Transit must serve the needs of the community. If a route is in place for commuters, should there also be routes in for students, shoppers and the seniors of the city. Why should every connection any citizen want to make be via a train.
If the transit system is in place, and the pathways are usable, we can have a great impact on the use of these systems. Reducing parking (where people do park), is not the solution. Restricting parking at key locations is a better solution.
Thank you, and once again, my name is Curtis Kruschel, and I am running for Alderman in Ward 4.
I attended an all alderman forum on Wednesday, and our question (for the candidates in ward 4) was the following. My answer is also below. We were given 90 seconds, and the time limit was restrictive in getting the point across, however, I did try.
The City is promoting more active mobility choices like cycling, transit and walking as alternatives to a car, particularly to those that live on primary transit routes like Centre Street. Would you support reducing parking requirements for new development to further encourage and support these lifestyle options?
Ward 4 has a blend of Inner Suburbs (Highland/Greenview), Established communities (Huntington, Thorncliffe, Sandstone, MacEwan), and New communities (Hidden Valley and Country Hills). My goal will be to discuss, evaluate, and harmonize the needs of the few to blend and create the needs of the many.
With each new development come many challenges.
#1 – Create an area where people want to live, not need to live.
#2 – Make sure it is a part of the Calgary Pathway System.
#3 – Make sure the residents have the residential parking they require.
#4 – Create a balance of Small, Medium, and high density population where the residents are satisfied in their choice of home.
#5 – Make sure they have the feeder transit (initially), and community & commuter transit (Permanent) after the area has been populated. (mostly by dual income, dual car families)
If a home has a double garage, I believe, that there should be at least one street space available per home. (Do you ever have guests?).
I believe that if there is parking close to a feeder transit route (near a park or a green space), the residents, and possibly even not the residents will use it so they can wait in their car (usually idling) for the next bus, and then hop out (after all, occasionally, it gets cold in this city) for convenience and no parking fee. This is a safety issue – think back to the playgrounds of old – we were always taught – don’t run between parked cars – well, if the space is available today, near a feeder transit route, it will be used. Look at Edgemont Blvd and John Laurie (right next to a green space and park) – The city provided “Resident Parking Only” signs do not seem to have any effect.
The solution is not to eliminate parking, but restrict it. Whether it be permit or time limits, these areas are vital to the community. If the park is on a main thoroughfare or the BLVD/Drive that connects the community – eventually, snow removal will be a priority. The next solution is provide effective transit. Transit must serve the needs of the community. If a route is in place for commuters, should there also be routes in for students, shoppers and the seniors of the city. Why should every connection any citizen want to make be via a train.
If the transit system is in place, and the pathways are usable, we can have a great impact on the use of these systems. Reducing parking (where people do park), is not the solution. Restricting parking at key locations is a better solution.
Thank you, and once again, my name is Curtis Kruschel, and I am running for Alderman in Ward 4.
Wednesday, October 13, 2010
St. Helena Jr. High School Town Hall
Today was extremely interesting. I found myself preparing for a Aldermanic forum - nothing odd here, except the audience. I was going to be addressing Grade 7, 8, and 9 students. As I thought about this task, the questions that came to mind were - Do I change my delivery - do I address their needs - Facebook, texting, and gaming? Why? I have always been about the community. It isn't just traffic, infrastructure, and accountability. Talking with my student contact, he understood my SMART traffic system. He knew my views and where I was coming from. (Ms. Wild - Reid deserves an "A"). So no change - talk to the students as you would anyone else. Students are amazing - say a word they don't understand, they don't give you the confidence nod - they say pardon me? Our ward is interesting - my daughter asked what was different about this election than others - via text btw, and I stated there was no incumbent - I got the typical student huh? So I explained...
Conversations with students shouldn't be any different than those you have with your buddies, your peers, and your constituents (who you first meet knocking on their door). You have to be able to communicate with all people all the time. If you take the average, then the business management constituents will understand what you are trying to convey as much as the Grade 9 student. When you start to use language to prove your knowledge, you may start to alienate some.
Congratulations to St. Helena for hosting the most robust, and widely attended forum (I know - the students were told to be there...) But if they listened, they heard some interesting comments, and of the 9 candidates that attended, we said the same, but different comments on the issues you raised. The key was - did you really listen?
Once again, Election day is October 18 - Please vote!
It was nice to be in a setting where people are excited about politics. To the kids of St. Helena - Stay excited, stay involved, stay informed. You are the future of Calgary, and if you take this to the next level, you will have and create an opinion that counts. Maybe even start your political career by unseating me as Ward 4 Alderman in 2016.
Have a super week!
Conversations with students shouldn't be any different than those you have with your buddies, your peers, and your constituents (who you first meet knocking on their door). You have to be able to communicate with all people all the time. If you take the average, then the business management constituents will understand what you are trying to convey as much as the Grade 9 student. When you start to use language to prove your knowledge, you may start to alienate some.
Congratulations to St. Helena for hosting the most robust, and widely attended forum (I know - the students were told to be there...) But if they listened, they heard some interesting comments, and of the 9 candidates that attended, we said the same, but different comments on the issues you raised. The key was - did you really listen?
Once again, Election day is October 18 - Please vote!
It was nice to be in a setting where people are excited about politics. To the kids of St. Helena - Stay excited, stay involved, stay informed. You are the future of Calgary, and if you take this to the next level, you will have and create an opinion that counts. Maybe even start your political career by unseating me as Ward 4 Alderman in 2016.
Have a super week!
Sunday, October 10, 2010
My Stance on Sports
Over the last 4 months, I have been actively campaigning to gain a seat as an Alderman chair for Ward 4. This task, has proven to be daunting, as with no incumbent, there are 11 Candidates.
There are issues at City hall, and all 11 candidates are preaching the same thing, although, I will not use the same words, they are saying; transparency, fiscal responsibility, accountability, and communication.
Of the 4 Political words, only one I use; accountability. The others have double meanings and definitions that can be vague. One area that has been forgotten is Sports and Recreation (for all)
As a parent (soccer dad and swimming dad), I see the need for more fields, more rinks, more pools. I see the kids with nothing to do. I see the need for active participation in some sort of extracurricular activity. It can be Dance, Swimming, Hockey, Lacrosse, Soccer, Fencing, Martial Arts, Music, or anything your child chooses to participate in.
Through 5 years of swimming and soccer, I have seen kids grow and become citizens. The kids that actively participate and care about the sport they are involved in teaches them accountability (to their team, and with their time), responsibility (fitting in homework with a sometime arduous schedule), commitment (to the team, themselves, and their goals), leadership (by example, never miss practice, show up early, stay late), and friendship. These traits all lead to a student that has all the skills required to be an excellent citizen as they move on in life – The future.
I have decided that I am the only candidate in ward 4 that has a focus on the future citizens and need to focus on the future. I will make Calgary a better place to live. I will spend your tax dollars smartly. I will not put up road blocks for sports related facilities in Calgary – We are Calgary – We are Canada – Why does Edmonton have twice as many soccer pitches (indoor and outdoor) than we do? Why does Edmonton have 7 skate parks, and us 2? This is their commitment to their youth. I am committed to our youth. I am committed to making sure the city does not take a facility like the NW Recreation Centre, The Foothills Field house, and the Soccer Centre all weather fields for granted, and put up road blocks to delay construction.
Election day is Oct 18 - See you at the polls
There are issues at City hall, and all 11 candidates are preaching the same thing, although, I will not use the same words, they are saying; transparency, fiscal responsibility, accountability, and communication.
Of the 4 Political words, only one I use; accountability. The others have double meanings and definitions that can be vague. One area that has been forgotten is Sports and Recreation (for all)
As a parent (soccer dad and swimming dad), I see the need for more fields, more rinks, more pools. I see the kids with nothing to do. I see the need for active participation in some sort of extracurricular activity. It can be Dance, Swimming, Hockey, Lacrosse, Soccer, Fencing, Martial Arts, Music, or anything your child chooses to participate in.
Through 5 years of swimming and soccer, I have seen kids grow and become citizens. The kids that actively participate and care about the sport they are involved in teaches them accountability (to their team, and with their time), responsibility (fitting in homework with a sometime arduous schedule), commitment (to the team, themselves, and their goals), leadership (by example, never miss practice, show up early, stay late), and friendship. These traits all lead to a student that has all the skills required to be an excellent citizen as they move on in life – The future.
I have decided that I am the only candidate in ward 4 that has a focus on the future citizens and need to focus on the future. I will make Calgary a better place to live. I will spend your tax dollars smartly. I will not put up road blocks for sports related facilities in Calgary – We are Calgary – We are Canada – Why does Edmonton have twice as many soccer pitches (indoor and outdoor) than we do? Why does Edmonton have 7 skate parks, and us 2? This is their commitment to their youth. I am committed to our youth. I am committed to making sure the city does not take a facility like the NW Recreation Centre, The Foothills Field house, and the Soccer Centre all weather fields for granted, and put up road blocks to delay construction.
Election day is Oct 18 - See you at the polls
Friday, October 8, 2010
Campaign Update #6
So, Here we go – 10 days until the election, and there is finally a place where you can hear me chat. On my Website, Under NEWS are three Videos. They are not that long, and I invite you to share these with your friends.
They are located on YouTube, but click here to make it easy - http://www.ck4a.ca/news.html
This has been a tough week. Everyone I talk to likes my stand, my composure, and the fact that I am not like the others. This is a good thing, but, getting the word out is tough. Two forums, and I am sure at least 50 KM walking – it is all looking promising. But without votes, promising is all it is.
The advance polls are open – they are open from noon – 7:00. They are scattered throughout the city. If you want to know which one is closest to you, send me a note, and I will find one for you based on where you are going to be in the city. (So I need a reference address) - email curtis@ck4a.ca
Have a super Thanksgiving, and I will send another update next week.
PS – Here is another ECO-Sign – to make up for the ones you have not seen – It seems if I find a spot for a sign or two, it immediately becomes surrounded by 2-5 of another candidates.
They are located on YouTube, but click here to make it easy - http://www.ck4a.ca/news.html
This has been a tough week. Everyone I talk to likes my stand, my composure, and the fact that I am not like the others. This is a good thing, but, getting the word out is tough. Two forums, and I am sure at least 50 KM walking – it is all looking promising. But without votes, promising is all it is.
The advance polls are open – they are open from noon – 7:00. They are scattered throughout the city. If you want to know which one is closest to you, send me a note, and I will find one for you based on where you are going to be in the city. (So I need a reference address) - email curtis@ck4a.ca
Have a super Thanksgiving, and I will send another update next week.
PS – Here is another ECO-Sign – to make up for the ones you have not seen – It seems if I find a spot for a sign or two, it immediately becomes surrounded by 2-5 of another candidates.
Elect: CURTIS KRUSCHEL
Alderman - Ward 4!
ELECTION DAY IS OCTOBER 18, 2010
Thursday, October 7, 2010
Civic Camp Forum - The questions I did not get to answer!
Last night was the CivicCamp forum, and candidates could be prepared by going to the website and seeing the top ten Citizen questions. Unfortunately, the question about Race City and Heritage sites did not come up. Below are my answers to those to issues.
Does the city have a role in preserving Heritage Site, and if so, what?
The role of the city in preserving heritage sites is vital to the nuance of our city, and our communities. The City of Calgary’s Heritage Policy provides important guidance and direction within the greater planning process.
Plan It Calgary will direct our communities of all ages and it includes heritage value statements. Imagine an archery target. The center is what we call Inner City, downtown, Fort Calgary, Inglewood, etc. The next ring of the target is called Inner Suburbs. Think about Mountainview, Tuxedo, Highland Park, etc. The third ring, we term established communities – Thorncliffe, Huntington, North Haven (most of the ward), and then the outer ring, New Communities Edgemont, Hidden Valley, and Country Hills.
Our communities may have buildings or landscapes which may be of heritage value in the future. The key to Heritage sites, is their “SIGNIFICANCE”. Significance can be anything from architecture to a person of interest and can be relevant to one of our communities or the City as a whole.
Consider our commercial sites. Perhaps the owner that would like to demolish and rebuild. But what if the structure is sound. If it is deemed of heritage significance can we not work with the owner to preserve the storefront, and rebuild the interior to suit the needs of the property owner. Examples that come to mind are 8th Avenue Mall, and the Alberta Hotel – Interiors redone, building structure and aura are maintained.
Next we have our residential homes. Does the house across the street have some heritage value? The communities of Calgary have a variety of architectural types and styles included some that will be significant examples of war time housing, 4 square bungalows, 60’s two storey two bedroom 1 bath houses, etc. Not everything should be saved but our City has an important responsibility in determined and encouraging preservation of what is of heritage value.
We also have industrial heritage. The Inglewood Brewery is a prime example. This is Calgary’s most significant industrial site and was owned by A.E. Cross of Big Four fame. Imagine the potential for integrating the heritage of this site into the site redevelopment. it could be the site for specific retail, restaurant, and cultural business while maintaining the key buildings and preserving our heritage. An example of re-vitalization of Heritage is Whyte Avenue, and Strathcona in Edmonton. (Sorry for swearing).
Let’s also consider some significant modern buildings and how they might be repurposed. The current CBE building will be vacated by the board, and this building is part of all our lives (specifically Native Calgarians, but we all refer to it as the building with the Statues…) Do you think, and this is my idea, that that building could host the Library? It may not be big enough for all the library infrastructure, but if it became “just a library”, I am sure there is enough space. Another site could perhaps house some of the administrative aspect of the library. This is just one example of thinking outside the box and retrofitting, reusing and refitting buildings of significance
The city has the Calgary Heritage Authority with a mandate to advise City Council on heritage matters. A study was done to make the committee even more effective and it ligers on a shelf. If elected, I will work to take the review off the shelf, and make sure the committee becomes even more effective. We need our Cultural Heritage as much as we need our Library’s, Police, Fire, and transit systems. They are a vital part of what makes our city and our communities great.
Do you support a long term lease for Race City as a track and advanced driving facility in Calgary?
Race City is an interesting topic. I am in favor of Race City having a facility, as it is important for people to have a place where they can actually use their muscle cars, and not race in the streets. It can also be key in bringing in other events like possibly an Indy or F1 race. These however require a large commitment from the community.
Race city is also a descent venue for Outdoor concerts.
Now, the land, which is owned by the City is scheduled to become a landfill. There is a lot of work that goes into preparation of an area to become a landfill. As the City is the landlord, they can in essence, not renew any lease they see fit. As was the case with the Golf Facility near the Calgary West soccer centre. If the city has not already invested the funds into landfill preparation, then I say keep Race City open, and extend their lease. If they have, the city may be able to make some concessions to help them move, but that would be all. Race city is a private company, and with any company and its dealings with landlords, sometimes, buildings and land at the end of a lease become unavailable, and the tenant has to make alternate arrangements.
My personal opinion is Keep it open. But I am unaware of the financial implications required in doing so.
----------
Keeping up with the sign race - below is once again, your Eco-sign. Please vote for me on Election Day!
Does the city have a role in preserving Heritage Site, and if so, what?
The role of the city in preserving heritage sites is vital to the nuance of our city, and our communities. The City of Calgary’s Heritage Policy provides important guidance and direction within the greater planning process.
Plan It Calgary will direct our communities of all ages and it includes heritage value statements. Imagine an archery target. The center is what we call Inner City, downtown, Fort Calgary, Inglewood, etc. The next ring of the target is called Inner Suburbs. Think about Mountainview, Tuxedo, Highland Park, etc. The third ring, we term established communities – Thorncliffe, Huntington, North Haven (most of the ward), and then the outer ring, New Communities Edgemont, Hidden Valley, and Country Hills.
Our communities may have buildings or landscapes which may be of heritage value in the future. The key to Heritage sites, is their “SIGNIFICANCE”. Significance can be anything from architecture to a person of interest and can be relevant to one of our communities or the City as a whole.
Consider our commercial sites. Perhaps the owner that would like to demolish and rebuild. But what if the structure is sound. If it is deemed of heritage significance can we not work with the owner to preserve the storefront, and rebuild the interior to suit the needs of the property owner. Examples that come to mind are 8th Avenue Mall, and the Alberta Hotel – Interiors redone, building structure and aura are maintained.
Next we have our residential homes. Does the house across the street have some heritage value? The communities of Calgary have a variety of architectural types and styles included some that will be significant examples of war time housing, 4 square bungalows, 60’s two storey two bedroom 1 bath houses, etc. Not everything should be saved but our City has an important responsibility in determined and encouraging preservation of what is of heritage value.
We also have industrial heritage. The Inglewood Brewery is a prime example. This is Calgary’s most significant industrial site and was owned by A.E. Cross of Big Four fame. Imagine the potential for integrating the heritage of this site into the site redevelopment. it could be the site for specific retail, restaurant, and cultural business while maintaining the key buildings and preserving our heritage. An example of re-vitalization of Heritage is Whyte Avenue, and Strathcona in Edmonton. (Sorry for swearing).
Let’s also consider some significant modern buildings and how they might be repurposed. The current CBE building will be vacated by the board, and this building is part of all our lives (specifically Native Calgarians, but we all refer to it as the building with the Statues…) Do you think, and this is my idea, that that building could host the Library? It may not be big enough for all the library infrastructure, but if it became “just a library”, I am sure there is enough space. Another site could perhaps house some of the administrative aspect of the library. This is just one example of thinking outside the box and retrofitting, reusing and refitting buildings of significance
The city has the Calgary Heritage Authority with a mandate to advise City Council on heritage matters. A study was done to make the committee even more effective and it ligers on a shelf. If elected, I will work to take the review off the shelf, and make sure the committee becomes even more effective. We need our Cultural Heritage as much as we need our Library’s, Police, Fire, and transit systems. They are a vital part of what makes our city and our communities great.
Do you support a long term lease for Race City as a track and advanced driving facility in Calgary?
Race City is an interesting topic. I am in favor of Race City having a facility, as it is important for people to have a place where they can actually use their muscle cars, and not race in the streets. It can also be key in bringing in other events like possibly an Indy or F1 race. These however require a large commitment from the community.
Race city is also a descent venue for Outdoor concerts.
Now, the land, which is owned by the City is scheduled to become a landfill. There is a lot of work that goes into preparation of an area to become a landfill. As the City is the landlord, they can in essence, not renew any lease they see fit. As was the case with the Golf Facility near the Calgary West soccer centre. If the city has not already invested the funds into landfill preparation, then I say keep Race City open, and extend their lease. If they have, the city may be able to make some concessions to help them move, but that would be all. Race city is a private company, and with any company and its dealings with landlords, sometimes, buildings and land at the end of a lease become unavailable, and the tenant has to make alternate arrangements.
My personal opinion is Keep it open. But I am unaware of the financial implications required in doing so.
----------
Keeping up with the sign race - below is once again, your Eco-sign. Please vote for me on Election Day!
Elect: CURTIS KRUSCHEL
Alderman - Ward 4!
ELECTION DAY IS OCTOBER 18, 2010
Tuesday, October 5, 2010
Response to Calgary Leadership Forum Survey
Here is another survey I received - the toughest part was stating a platform and comparing to current city policies - nonetheless, it is below, unedited, as submitted.
Have a great day all.
Information will be posted at Calgaryvotesonline.com
CANDIDATE QUESTIONAIRE
1. Candidate Profile - Please provide a candidates profile, to a maximum of 200 words that accurately introduces yourself to the citizens of Calgary. Recommended subjects could include;
- Career, business and or professional experience
- Service to the community - past and present
- Reason for running for office
- Will you serve full or part time?
I am an IT professional of 30 years, working in all aspects of support from Mainframe operations to Help Desk support and management. My community service has ranged from a community association board member, to the sports fields of the city. Becoming a soccer referee, then referee coordinator, and then changing from flat fields to flat water, I have been actively involved in the competitive swimming world for the last 5 years. I am running for Alderman, as I want to take it to the next level. Community to City. It is my goal to be a full time alderman, and that is my commitment to Ward 4.
2. Top 3 Issues/Personal Commitment/Accountability - what are your top 3 issues, on which you are willing to be held accountable to the citizens of Calgary at the next civic election, should you be elected or reelected? How does this differ from current city policy? (Please limit answer to 200 words)
The first issue is the 60M shortfall. I will find the money without cutting key services to the citizens – Police, Fire, Transit, and Library. These services are the face of the city. I will not borrow from capital budget to offset the legislated “non-deficit” operational budget. Another personal issue, closer to the community, is the kids right to play. Whether it be sports or the arts, I firmly believe the kids have a right to play. Finally, city services need to be expanded to all of the taxpayer base. Is it fair that a business in an industrial park which pays property and business taxes do not have the same city services as the base property owner / downtown employee.
3. Financial Responsibility - What is your policy on taxation, and specifically would you support limiting tax increases to the rate of inflation? How does this differ from current city policy? (Please limit answer to 75 words)
If the city wants increases services, the only solution is a tax increase. More snow removal, more recycling, more roads, no potholes, etc. All services have a cost, without a tax increase, how are these to be implemented. On that note, if there is an increase and no proof of service, we will have failed.
4. Public Transparency- What is your position on public business being done in the public and not behind closed doors? How does this differ from current city policy? (Please limit answer to 75 words)
Transparency is the word of the election. Is transparency operation in a fish bowl, or making issue pass through being completely invisible? All city decisions should be open to the public. There are specific issues that require “in camera” discussions, and this is the case with any board. My goal: community participation on all key issues.
5. Citizen Engagement-Please describe your personal philosophy towards active citizen engagement and participation? How does this differ from current city policy? (Please limit answer to 75 words)
Community residents will have access to participate in all decisions. We have the technology, but Ward 4 is an established community. All residents must have access. Legacy technology must be available so ALL constituents have a voice. I will be participating in community board meetings, and informing the community with all media forms possible, from web, to the community newsletter. This is and has always been an integral part of my platform.
6. Sustainability and Quality of life - What do you propose to support the philosophy of sustainability to maintain and improve the quality of life? How does this differ from current city policy? (Please limit answer to 75 words)
The residents are smart, and want to protect their neighborhoods. They do not want increased traffic; as well as they want it to be safe. Through a basic concept of lighting a flood rink, you can expand this to making sure all pedestrian walkways have lighting, if parks have lighting, then everything becomes safer. Our neighborhood is also blessed with Nose Hill Park. These park areas should remain protected for the benefit of all.
6. Contact Information- Please provide the following;
• phone number- (587) 999-2542
• email- Curtis@ck4a.ca
• website- www.ck4a.ca
• facebook- http://www.facebook.com/people/Curtis-Kruschel/100001428487430
• twitter- http://www.twitter.com/ck4a
• rss feed- http://ck4a.blogspot.com/
Have a great day all.
Information will be posted at Calgaryvotesonline.com
CANDIDATE QUESTIONAIRE
1. Candidate Profile - Please provide a candidates profile, to a maximum of 200 words that accurately introduces yourself to the citizens of Calgary. Recommended subjects could include;
- Career, business and or professional experience
- Service to the community - past and present
- Reason for running for office
- Will you serve full or part time?
I am an IT professional of 30 years, working in all aspects of support from Mainframe operations to Help Desk support and management. My community service has ranged from a community association board member, to the sports fields of the city. Becoming a soccer referee, then referee coordinator, and then changing from flat fields to flat water, I have been actively involved in the competitive swimming world for the last 5 years. I am running for Alderman, as I want to take it to the next level. Community to City. It is my goal to be a full time alderman, and that is my commitment to Ward 4.
2. Top 3 Issues/Personal Commitment/Accountability - what are your top 3 issues, on which you are willing to be held accountable to the citizens of Calgary at the next civic election, should you be elected or reelected? How does this differ from current city policy? (Please limit answer to 200 words)
The first issue is the 60M shortfall. I will find the money without cutting key services to the citizens – Police, Fire, Transit, and Library. These services are the face of the city. I will not borrow from capital budget to offset the legislated “non-deficit” operational budget. Another personal issue, closer to the community, is the kids right to play. Whether it be sports or the arts, I firmly believe the kids have a right to play. Finally, city services need to be expanded to all of the taxpayer base. Is it fair that a business in an industrial park which pays property and business taxes do not have the same city services as the base property owner / downtown employee.
3. Financial Responsibility - What is your policy on taxation, and specifically would you support limiting tax increases to the rate of inflation? How does this differ from current city policy? (Please limit answer to 75 words)
If the city wants increases services, the only solution is a tax increase. More snow removal, more recycling, more roads, no potholes, etc. All services have a cost, without a tax increase, how are these to be implemented. On that note, if there is an increase and no proof of service, we will have failed.
4. Public Transparency- What is your position on public business being done in the public and not behind closed doors? How does this differ from current city policy? (Please limit answer to 75 words)
Transparency is the word of the election. Is transparency operation in a fish bowl, or making issue pass through being completely invisible? All city decisions should be open to the public. There are specific issues that require “in camera” discussions, and this is the case with any board. My goal: community participation on all key issues.
5. Citizen Engagement-Please describe your personal philosophy towards active citizen engagement and participation? How does this differ from current city policy? (Please limit answer to 75 words)
Community residents will have access to participate in all decisions. We have the technology, but Ward 4 is an established community. All residents must have access. Legacy technology must be available so ALL constituents have a voice. I will be participating in community board meetings, and informing the community with all media forms possible, from web, to the community newsletter. This is and has always been an integral part of my platform.
6. Sustainability and Quality of life - What do you propose to support the philosophy of sustainability to maintain and improve the quality of life? How does this differ from current city policy? (Please limit answer to 75 words)
The residents are smart, and want to protect their neighborhoods. They do not want increased traffic; as well as they want it to be safe. Through a basic concept of lighting a flood rink, you can expand this to making sure all pedestrian walkways have lighting, if parks have lighting, then everything becomes safer. Our neighborhood is also blessed with Nose Hill Park. These park areas should remain protected for the benefit of all.
6. Contact Information- Please provide the following;
• phone number- (587) 999-2542
• email- Curtis@ck4a.ca
• website- www.ck4a.ca
• facebook- http://www.facebook.com/people/Curtis-Kruschel/100001428487430
• twitter- http://www.twitter.com/ck4a
• rss feed- http://ck4a.blogspot.com/
Friday, October 1, 2010
Now the sign war gets personal!
It isn't that this ward has the most candidates, and our green space is turning into sign space, but that said, there are certain areas that I consider out of bounds.
The Bylaw says - Centre street, 14 street, Beddington Trail, Sarcee, Shaganappi, Country Hills Blvd, Deerfoot Trail are all sign free, with the exception of private property.
Nose Hill Park is an environmental park for use of hikers, mountain bikers, and just general walkers. I realise that since Nose Hill Park was created, it has become an island in it's own right, but there are still deer, owls, and other wildlife that call it home. Sooner or later, Fish Creek will also be completely urbanised, if it hasn't been already, but the residents respect and use the park for it's purpose - recreation. Nose Hill Park is key to our ward, and a large land mass sustaining the significant wildlife, as well as providing a scenic walk in the park area for the residents of the Ward and other surrounding areas. Let's keep it free of capitalistic additions such as advertising and let the park be what it is - a park.
The city provides parking, but as far as I am concerned, that is all the non-natural that should be allowed. Some candidates have decided that advertising is allowed. Signs destroy the aura of the park, and this should tell you how they treat our environmental areas... Can you imagine Banff National Park with a sign every 2-300 meters along the parkway... Enough said... You decide...
The Bylaw says - Centre street, 14 street, Beddington Trail, Sarcee, Shaganappi, Country Hills Blvd, Deerfoot Trail are all sign free, with the exception of private property.
Nose Hill Park is an environmental park for use of hikers, mountain bikers, and just general walkers. I realise that since Nose Hill Park was created, it has become an island in it's own right, but there are still deer, owls, and other wildlife that call it home. Sooner or later, Fish Creek will also be completely urbanised, if it hasn't been already, but the residents respect and use the park for it's purpose - recreation. Nose Hill Park is key to our ward, and a large land mass sustaining the significant wildlife, as well as providing a scenic walk in the park area for the residents of the Ward and other surrounding areas. Let's keep it free of capitalistic additions such as advertising and let the park be what it is - a park.
The city provides parking, but as far as I am concerned, that is all the non-natural that should be allowed. Some candidates have decided that advertising is allowed. Signs destroy the aura of the park, and this should tell you how they treat our environmental areas... Can you imagine Banff National Park with a sign every 2-300 meters along the parkway... Enough said... You decide...
Thursday, September 30, 2010
Today's Metro and "2" Aldermanic Forums for Ward 4
Today's Metro was awesome - the coverage of the Ward 4 candidates are the results of 1 small questionnaire we all received. Thank you Metro for your continued election coverage, and support of the Civiccamp forums. The Ward 4 link is here (in case you missed Thursdays paper)
http://www.metronews.ca/calgary/local/article/649424--ward-4-meet-your-candidates
There is some irony in the "Why Run?" section that I find quite humorous.
Anyhow, on a more serious note:
Huntington Hills Community Association is hosting an "All Candidate" forum on Monday October 4 from 7-10 PM in the main hall. This moderated forum will be audience based questions asked of the candidates. The hall is located at Centre Street and 78th Avenue NW
Civic Camp is hosting another All Candidate forum on Wednesday October 6, at the Foothills Alliance Church. (333 Edgepark Blvd - Behind the Edgemont Superstore). This forum, also moderated will have Civic Camp web site selected questions, as well as Ward based questions. It runs from 7-9 PM. Please visit this non-partisan website for more information about Civic Camp - http://www.civiccamp.org/
Both forums are well worth attending, if not at least to meet everyone. All information is available on my website. http://www.ck4a.ca/
Have a great day, and we will see you on the trail!
http://www.metronews.ca/calgary/local/article/649424--ward-4-meet-your-candidates
There is some irony in the "Why Run?" section that I find quite humorous.
Anyhow, on a more serious note:
Huntington Hills Community Association is hosting an "All Candidate" forum on Monday October 4 from 7-10 PM in the main hall. This moderated forum will be audience based questions asked of the candidates. The hall is located at Centre Street and 78th Avenue NW
Civic Camp is hosting another All Candidate forum on Wednesday October 6, at the Foothills Alliance Church. (333 Edgepark Blvd - Behind the Edgemont Superstore). This forum, also moderated will have Civic Camp web site selected questions, as well as Ward based questions. It runs from 7-9 PM. Please visit this non-partisan website for more information about Civic Camp - http://www.civiccamp.org/
Both forums are well worth attending, if not at least to meet everyone. All information is available on my website. http://www.ck4a.ca/
Have a great day, and we will see you on the trail!
Monday, September 27, 2010
Signs Signs and More Signs
I have a few signs, maybe strategically located, maybe not - there are 11 candidates in the ward, and if I wasn't running, would I really be paying attention, or would I just be commenting on the amount of signs.
More to come, but, vandalism, and the wonderful wind storm that passed through yesterday take their toll.
I hope to get a flyer to most of the ward by Oct 6 - and I hope you all make it to the polls on Oct 18. Advance poll information is a click away from the homepage of my website - http://www.ck4a.ca/
Please consider this blog, your Personal Lawn sign - that you haven't seen on the road:
More to come, but, vandalism, and the wonderful wind storm that passed through yesterday take their toll.
I hope to get a flyer to most of the ward by Oct 6 - and I hope you all make it to the polls on Oct 18. Advance poll information is a click away from the homepage of my website - http://www.ck4a.ca/
Please consider this blog, your Personal Lawn sign - that you haven't seen on the road:
Elect: CURTIS KRUSCHEL
Alderman - Ward 4!
ELECTION DAY IS OCTOBER 18, 2010
Tuesday, September 21, 2010
Surveys Surveys Surveys
During the nomination process, we were handed surveys from numerous lobbyists. My responses to the Calgary Herald are the subject of today's blog.
Name: Curtis Kruschel
Age:47
Married – With two Children (Wife: Kelly, Daughters Courtney - Gr. 12 and Meghan Gr. 10)
Political Experience: None at this level – Previously active on Community Boards, Soccer Boards, and currently President of Nose Creek Swim Association
Running for: Alderman – Ward 4
Web Site – ck4a.ca
Twitter – #ck4a
1 – "How would you describe your political/leadership style?" - My political leadership style is one of participation. I am one that wants to meet and talk to all those with issues and concerns. If I do not know an answer, I find out, and if I have an opinion, it is just that, and opinion. I can be swayed, but expect strong arguments in return.
2 – "Describe you most significant achievement over the past 5 years?" - Over the past 5 years, my most significant achievement is probably the success of my swim club. Numbers are up, kids are getting faster (That is our coaches, not me), but it’s success is based on the Board (operations), and the Coaches (infrastructure), which I play a role in.
3 – "What is the biggest issue facing Calgarians in the next three years? What would you do about it?" - The biggest issue facing Calgarians over the next 3 years will be understanding the city, the process, and integration of solutions being provided by a new council. I feel that in general, Calgarians understand where there money is being spent, but one hot topic, and one boisterous respected opinion starts the uproar. Each councilor participates on some committee of some sort – They must be as accountable for their actions and those of the city staff. They must make sure they understand completely what each committee goal and vision is. This information must be relayed to the residents in a way that everyone understands so there can be no misunderstanding of the intentions.
4 – "How should the next council address the estimated $60M revenue shortfall? Where should that money be found?" - The budget shortfall will be a challenge for the new council. Each department will submit their budgets, and hopefully, the tax increases that must follow, will allow for a balanced budget. 5% seems to be a magic number – If we can hold tax increases to a number less than this, it seems the citizen base is happy. Announce 6-8%, and the Council sets up the defense, and citizens rally against city hall. I do not think that we can repair the shortfall without cuts in departments, or raising the taxes. To me, it seems like new council will be faced with a double edge sword and some tough decisions.
5 – "Do you promise to keep property tax increases at or below the rate of inflation over the next three years? Why or why not?" - Answered above. However, if snow REMOVAL, and not movement, becomes a more prominent issue, then let’s address the need. People always want to keep the tax base low, but then council makes up for it by introducing service fees. Look at your Water bill – it includes trash, recycling, administration, and then the smallest part of the bill is Water. Fixed income residents would prefer fixed bills, and this includes their taxes. They do not want to see changes in utility bills because the City introduces new and/or higher service fees. I am in favor of eliminating the park and ride fee for transit passengers who purchase bus passes. I am willing to even set up a reserved parking system, and implement a higher fee transit bus pass. If the cost of a bus pass remains tax deductable, then at least the rider can recoup some of their expenses. It also saves the pain of charging to a credit card, or always having an extra $3 in your pocket.
6 – "Do you support additional, or higher, user fees to offset tax increases?" - Answered above – User fees have their place, but if it is going to cost $10 a month to recycle, then that is a tax increase of $120. Landlords do not like this idea, but one way or another, it will be passed on to their tenant. If the Airport Tunnel, and LRT
7 – "Do you support having an independant city auditor who would oversee city spending and report to the public?" - Auditors are required for most companies. Internal, and external. Why would the city not operate the same way.
8 - "Would you support a Provincial audit of the city's finances" - Would a provincial audit not classify as “external”?
9 - "Do you think firefighter salaries and library services should be given the same protection from cuts as the police front line was given?" – I believe critical service budgets should be approved as long as they are within reason. Fire fighters are frontline protectors of property. With Calgary’s continued growth, there is a need for more. The Library is an essential service for everyone. Our Library is one of the most used services based on population in North America, if not the world. They have integrated into the city and supplied a service that people rely on. I believe there are other answers to the W.R. Castell building issue, and we could possibly save money by utilizing other city infrastructure and/or a partnership with a certain oil company that may or may not want to re-start a smaller project they put on hold.
10 "What do voters not know about you? Tell us one of your secrets..." – The voters do not know that I am not affiliated with any political party in the province, or the nation.
Name: Curtis Kruschel
Age:47
Married – With two Children (Wife: Kelly, Daughters Courtney - Gr. 12 and Meghan Gr. 10)
Political Experience: None at this level – Previously active on Community Boards, Soccer Boards, and currently President of Nose Creek Swim Association
Running for: Alderman – Ward 4
Web Site – ck4a.ca
Twitter – #ck4a
1 – "How would you describe your political/leadership style?" - My political leadership style is one of participation. I am one that wants to meet and talk to all those with issues and concerns. If I do not know an answer, I find out, and if I have an opinion, it is just that, and opinion. I can be swayed, but expect strong arguments in return.
2 – "Describe you most significant achievement over the past 5 years?" - Over the past 5 years, my most significant achievement is probably the success of my swim club. Numbers are up, kids are getting faster (That is our coaches, not me), but it’s success is based on the Board (operations), and the Coaches (infrastructure), which I play a role in.
3 – "What is the biggest issue facing Calgarians in the next three years? What would you do about it?" - The biggest issue facing Calgarians over the next 3 years will be understanding the city, the process, and integration of solutions being provided by a new council. I feel that in general, Calgarians understand where there money is being spent, but one hot topic, and one boisterous respected opinion starts the uproar. Each councilor participates on some committee of some sort – They must be as accountable for their actions and those of the city staff. They must make sure they understand completely what each committee goal and vision is. This information must be relayed to the residents in a way that everyone understands so there can be no misunderstanding of the intentions.
4 – "How should the next council address the estimated $60M revenue shortfall? Where should that money be found?" - The budget shortfall will be a challenge for the new council. Each department will submit their budgets, and hopefully, the tax increases that must follow, will allow for a balanced budget. 5% seems to be a magic number – If we can hold tax increases to a number less than this, it seems the citizen base is happy. Announce 6-8%, and the Council sets up the defense, and citizens rally against city hall. I do not think that we can repair the shortfall without cuts in departments, or raising the taxes. To me, it seems like new council will be faced with a double edge sword and some tough decisions.
5 – "Do you promise to keep property tax increases at or below the rate of inflation over the next three years? Why or why not?" - Answered above. However, if snow REMOVAL, and not movement, becomes a more prominent issue, then let’s address the need. People always want to keep the tax base low, but then council makes up for it by introducing service fees. Look at your Water bill – it includes trash, recycling, administration, and then the smallest part of the bill is Water. Fixed income residents would prefer fixed bills, and this includes their taxes. They do not want to see changes in utility bills because the City introduces new and/or higher service fees. I am in favor of eliminating the park and ride fee for transit passengers who purchase bus passes. I am willing to even set up a reserved parking system, and implement a higher fee transit bus pass. If the cost of a bus pass remains tax deductable, then at least the rider can recoup some of their expenses. It also saves the pain of charging to a credit card, or always having an extra $3 in your pocket.
6 – "Do you support additional, or higher, user fees to offset tax increases?" - Answered above – User fees have their place, but if it is going to cost $10 a month to recycle, then that is a tax increase of $120. Landlords do not like this idea, but one way or another, it will be passed on to their tenant. If the Airport Tunnel, and LRT
7 – "Do you support having an independant city auditor who would oversee city spending and report to the public?" - Auditors are required for most companies. Internal, and external. Why would the city not operate the same way.
8 - "Would you support a Provincial audit of the city's finances" - Would a provincial audit not classify as “external”?
9 - "Do you think firefighter salaries and library services should be given the same protection from cuts as the police front line was given?" – I believe critical service budgets should be approved as long as they are within reason. Fire fighters are frontline protectors of property. With Calgary’s continued growth, there is a need for more. The Library is an essential service for everyone. Our Library is one of the most used services based on population in North America, if not the world. They have integrated into the city and supplied a service that people rely on. I believe there are other answers to the W.R. Castell building issue, and we could possibly save money by utilizing other city infrastructure and/or a partnership with a certain oil company that may or may not want to re-start a smaller project they put on hold.
10 "What do voters not know about you? Tell us one of your secrets..." – The voters do not know that I am not affiliated with any political party in the province, or the nation.
Monday, September 20, 2010
Sept 20, 2010 - Let the race begin!
Today, nomination day, started as any other, with the exception, that I would be officially a candidate for Alderman of Ward 4. Thank you to all who signed my papers, and now Let the Race begin.
During the nomination process, I found out the Sean, Jane, and Brad are definitely running (I saw them or their campaign managers). However, that left another 8. I am sure based on the plethora of signs appearing, that all will file. Tomorrow we find out for sure.
I would like to thank those of you that were able to help Lynne this morning. She was most appreciative, and there is always something to be said for bad luck, and resolution through the help of a few friends.
I would like to apologize to the clerk whose table I left my coffee on... I am sure you didn't need anything else on your desk. When I finally left the mayhem of lobbyists, cameramen, reporters, and returned to the calm of the City Hall Lobby, I realized what I had done.
To all of my supporters, this race will be short - My oath to you during this campaign, I will answer all emails and questions as quickly as possible. I will smile. I will not twist anything that I do not know to be fact, and if I do not know, I will find an answer. I hope that you can all challenge me to be the best I can be, and that none of your concerns will be "swept under the rug" and ignored or treated as an oversight by me.
If during the campaign, I adhere to this, I will win the support of all and the election. Thank you in advance.
During the nomination process, I found out the Sean, Jane, and Brad are definitely running (I saw them or their campaign managers). However, that left another 8. I am sure based on the plethora of signs appearing, that all will file. Tomorrow we find out for sure.
I would like to thank those of you that were able to help Lynne this morning. She was most appreciative, and there is always something to be said for bad luck, and resolution through the help of a few friends.
I would like to apologize to the clerk whose table I left my coffee on... I am sure you didn't need anything else on your desk. When I finally left the mayhem of lobbyists, cameramen, reporters, and returned to the calm of the City Hall Lobby, I realized what I had done.
To all of my supporters, this race will be short - My oath to you during this campaign, I will answer all emails and questions as quickly as possible. I will smile. I will not twist anything that I do not know to be fact, and if I do not know, I will find an answer. I hope that you can all challenge me to be the best I can be, and that none of your concerns will be "swept under the rug" and ignored or treated as an oversight by me.
If during the campaign, I adhere to this, I will win the support of all and the election. Thank you in advance.
Thursday, September 16, 2010
The Library - A subject close to everyone
In recnt news articles, the city has stated that they would reduce services in the Library area to accommodate the need renovations of the W.R.Castell Branch. I have a couple of ideas. Although, not sure about the cost, maybe they could be evaluated.
#1 - The CBE will be consolidating all their office in the near future. Is the old CBE building a good location for the library. Is it easier or more cost effective to renovate that building, and move?
#2 - Encana halted construction on Little Bow, as the economy turned down. Would a P3 partnership not be an idea to move the library to the Little Bow - It could give Encana good marketing, it is in the core, and even more central than the current location. They just have to complete the project.
Just ideas - nothing in stone, I just do not want to see any service cuts to a piece of the city that is so vital. Calgary has the number 1 library system in North America based on use. Why mess with something successful.
#1 - The CBE will be consolidating all their office in the near future. Is the old CBE building a good location for the library. Is it easier or more cost effective to renovate that building, and move?
#2 - Encana halted construction on Little Bow, as the economy turned down. Would a P3 partnership not be an idea to move the library to the Little Bow - It could give Encana good marketing, it is in the core, and even more central than the current location. They just have to complete the project.
Just ideas - nothing in stone, I just do not want to see any service cuts to a piece of the city that is so vital. Calgary has the number 1 library system in North America based on use. Why mess with something successful.
Friday, September 3, 2010
Candidate Forum - Ward 4
What a blast! I guess if this campaign wasn't going to be fun, I wouldn't be doing it.
On September 2nd, all 11 declared candidates showed up as Thorncliff/Greenview hosted a candidate forum. We know that concerned citizens of Calgary care about particular issues, and they came prepared.
Questions ranged from Car Traps (Although, people still insist on calling them Bus Traps), co-existence of Business/Industrial Parks, and residential neighbourhoods, Traffic short cutting and management in our ward, dog parks, and another broad range of issues.
We all had our key issues, which for the most part all had a chance to discuss. Instead of re-hashing all the information, I will let you know that each candidate has a specific agenda or platform. You most likely know mine, as you are reading this, and my previous post was a excerpt directly from my website.
I know the people in attendance picked up as much marketing material as they could handle, and all are now digesting the information.
Did the key issues come up - Yes - Airport Tunnel, Poor City Spending habits, snow removal, urban sprawl and the bridge was mentioned in passing. All 11 candidates had a voice, and the moderator should be congratulated for keeping time in place, and his setup, execution, and participation with the "Random" questions. I just want to know what the 11 questions were we never heard...
Have a great long weekend!
On September 2nd, all 11 declared candidates showed up as Thorncliff/Greenview hosted a candidate forum. We know that concerned citizens of Calgary care about particular issues, and they came prepared.
Questions ranged from Car Traps (Although, people still insist on calling them Bus Traps), co-existence of Business/Industrial Parks, and residential neighbourhoods, Traffic short cutting and management in our ward, dog parks, and another broad range of issues.
We all had our key issues, which for the most part all had a chance to discuss. Instead of re-hashing all the information, I will let you know that each candidate has a specific agenda or platform. You most likely know mine, as you are reading this, and my previous post was a excerpt directly from my website.
I know the people in attendance picked up as much marketing material as they could handle, and all are now digesting the information.
Did the key issues come up - Yes - Airport Tunnel, Poor City Spending habits, snow removal, urban sprawl and the bridge was mentioned in passing. All 11 candidates had a voice, and the moderator should be congratulated for keeping time in place, and his setup, execution, and participation with the "Random" questions. I just want to know what the 11 questions were we never heard...
Have a great long weekend!
Sunday, August 15, 2010
My stand on Issues asked of me...
Below is a recent update on my website - I just thought I would create a big blog with a ton of info. If you want to chat more, please come to my Meet and Greet on Aug 24 or 25, in Huntington, and Edgemont respectively - Full Information is available on my website http://www.ck4a.ca/ - See you soon...
Where do I stand?
Most of the time, in a lineup, but with the campaign ramping up, I thought I would tell you my points of view on issues that were brought to my attention, or I was asked to comment on over the past couple of months...
Airport Tunnel: To me, this is a no brainer - why should 90% of the city be forced to access the Airport via Deerfoot trail. In my opinion, new council should do everything in their power to insure the tunnel is built now.
Secondary Suites: This issue is close to my heart, as I live on a transient street, with a number of duplexes, and renters. The main issue is the landlord has to respect his neighbors more than his pocketbook. Renting to groups of people means that parking is a premium. I believe if you change an area to allow for secondary suites, then there will be parking issues. If the housing areas are close to schools, and transit, it means that the cars just sit there. I am in favor of permit parking in all areas where secondary suites are allowed. I just want to park in front of my house.
Traffic: I believe if there is a left turn signal at an intersection, and there is a car in the left turn lane, it only makes sense to use the signal, and have an advance left. (e.g. 64th Ave. and 4th St. NW) Why should the signal just be controlled by the Fire Department? I believe instead of a crosswalk with flashing yellow lights to indicate a pedestrian, put in more pedestrian controlled traffic signals. These stop the traffic, and ensure the pedestrian waits for a walk signal. (e.g. 7th Ave. and Edmonton Tr. NE). If you happen to be heading northbound on 4th street NW near 68th, at 3:15 in the afternoon, it seems the students walk in single file, and continually cross the street. There is no break for traffic to move again.
Parks and Flood Rinks: We have a number of parks, playgrounds, and flood rinks, in Ward 4. I believe that there is economical and possibly eco-friendly solution to lighting that could be used to light these parks. Now, in August, this may not be an issue, but night almost seems continuous in the winter months. I would like to see one or two more skate/bmx parks in our ward. Possibly close to the recreation centre's or schools.
WARD Redefined: I am not sure as to the actual reasoning of the new ward boundaries, but with Cambrian, Rosemount, Queens Park, and Highwood moving to Ward 7, and Edgemont and Country Hills moving to Ward 4, you can see some correlation when you look at a map. Why we would separate Country Hills from the rest of the Northern Hills? To me, this seemed a little odd. Also adding Edgemont to the fold changed the geography a little. They are isolated from the rest of ward 4 by Nose Hill Park.
Financial Accountability: Recently the city commented on the stale-mated growth of the city. One would hope the budget is based on real numbers of people and a tax base that can be calculated. If a budget is forecasted on growth potential and not the actual tax base, what is the new council left with when budget meetings roll around in November? We all know you can't borrow from operations to fund capital expenditures, but we need to be sure the city business continues to run. This means we have to take a look at all our operations to ensure we break even. Unlike a business, our shareholders are more interested in keeping their share cost low (taxes), but still keep all the existing, implement new, and improving on existing services to keep their city one of the best in Canada to live in.
Low Cost Housing: If the city can encourage developers to incorporate low cost housing to new residential areas, and keep the design and aura of the neighborhood that they had in mind, it will encourage new home OWNERS, which in turn creates a larger tax based to draw from. My idea of low cost housing is not in the form of Rentals. I think everyone deserves a chance to own their home.
Developer's participation in infrastructure: With each new community in the city, comes a need for new streets, new sewers, and additional services in the form of power, trash, recycling, and business development. I believe the developers should participate in the financing of city infrastructure. Is it fair for all taxpayers to pay for the new areas?
Business to Business: What am I going to do to make sure businesses stay in the core or at least in Calgary, and not leave for the suburbs of Okotoks, Airdrie, Strathmore, etc? This problem is two fold. The small cities on the outskirts of Calgary provide space and lower taxes to lure the businesses into a new home. In Calgary, property owners in the core can help with this dilemma. As much as there is a business tax base, we need to make sure the businesses are located in Calgary. Landlords do not want empty office towers. The onus lies on their doorstep to try and keep their occupancy rate low. The city can help, but I am not prepared to say how, as it is or could be considered a broken promise. I do think something could be done about parking in the core. Is there a reason that parking spots cost as much as a small apartment? And even the meters. You get a discount for the first hour, but have you ever tried to get anything done downtown in less than one hour? This one needs to be investigated. I sure hope that our meter rates aren't based on the implementation of Park Plus. Maybe once it has paid for itself they could lower the rates. After all, the BC Government did remove the Toll Booth on the Coquihalla.
Transit: It seems to me that we need to evaluate how transit operates at rush hour. I know they try, as you see three route 301 busses packed to the rim go by the bus loop at 78th every morning. We want people to ride the bus, but must make it work for all. Is it fair that a Crowfoot train is full at McMahon. four car trains are coming, but when? Staggered starts may be an option, and this may already be happening. As for transit rates, to me, they seem fair. I was paying $2.75 in greater Vancouver 15 years ago. We also need to figure a way to operate for people in communities. For me to get from Huntington to Edgemont, I need to take 3 busses. Circle routes have some balance, but when all main routes operate on a straight line through the city, as the city grows, getting from A to B requires thought and great timing. Transit also has an affect on our schools. The express busses that make one run in the morning, immediately switch to a district school run, and then after school operate in reverse. I do not have the ultimate solution, but it is on my Radar.
Recycling/Trash: When the city wide recycling program started, the first 3 weeks, my blue bin was packed. I saved it, knowing it was coming. Now with the program established, I never fill the bin in a week. We could realize some cost savings in this department one of two ways. Change the schedule to a 7 business day rotation. Also, as each resident has to insure the bin is properly placed in the alleys and on the streets, would it not make sense to have them all on one side of the street. This would save driver time; in they would not have to go down the same streets twice. I know that I would not have a problem moving my bin across the alley if it meant the costs of the program were lowered. As for trash, I have yet to fill my bin on a weekly basis. When this program is fully functional city wide, I will have no problem buying a tag for my excess garbage. Grass clippings and leaves are the biggest space takers in garbage scenario. I imagine, as with recycling, the compost program will also eventually return to our ward / city.
The $60 Million Budget shortfall: New council will have their hands full with this one - if all programs, and business units are to get the same treatment as CPS (which I agreed with), then each unit will need to evaluate all aspects of their business. With this in mind, key services, such as the Fire Department and Calgary Police Services I foresee their budget request being approved if they are reasonable. As the city grows the needs for these services grows. This means recruitment, equipment, and other capital expenditures associated with their infrastructure. If we (the new council) are not blindsided by the previous administration, then all should move forward. Is 6% increase in taxes unreasonable - it is, and it is threatened every year? They cut, chop, snip, and eventually lower it to a more workable figure. Is the 6% just a scare tactic, so that when the real increase is announced, it is accepted?
More later - Have a great Day !
Where do I stand?
Most of the time, in a lineup, but with the campaign ramping up, I thought I would tell you my points of view on issues that were brought to my attention, or I was asked to comment on over the past couple of months...
Airport Tunnel: To me, this is a no brainer - why should 90% of the city be forced to access the Airport via Deerfoot trail. In my opinion, new council should do everything in their power to insure the tunnel is built now.
Secondary Suites: This issue is close to my heart, as I live on a transient street, with a number of duplexes, and renters. The main issue is the landlord has to respect his neighbors more than his pocketbook. Renting to groups of people means that parking is a premium. I believe if you change an area to allow for secondary suites, then there will be parking issues. If the housing areas are close to schools, and transit, it means that the cars just sit there. I am in favor of permit parking in all areas where secondary suites are allowed. I just want to park in front of my house.
Traffic: I believe if there is a left turn signal at an intersection, and there is a car in the left turn lane, it only makes sense to use the signal, and have an advance left. (e.g. 64th Ave. and 4th St. NW) Why should the signal just be controlled by the Fire Department? I believe instead of a crosswalk with flashing yellow lights to indicate a pedestrian, put in more pedestrian controlled traffic signals. These stop the traffic, and ensure the pedestrian waits for a walk signal. (e.g. 7th Ave. and Edmonton Tr. NE). If you happen to be heading northbound on 4th street NW near 68th, at 3:15 in the afternoon, it seems the students walk in single file, and continually cross the street. There is no break for traffic to move again.
Parks and Flood Rinks: We have a number of parks, playgrounds, and flood rinks, in Ward 4. I believe that there is economical and possibly eco-friendly solution to lighting that could be used to light these parks. Now, in August, this may not be an issue, but night almost seems continuous in the winter months. I would like to see one or two more skate/bmx parks in our ward. Possibly close to the recreation centre's or schools.
WARD Redefined: I am not sure as to the actual reasoning of the new ward boundaries, but with Cambrian, Rosemount, Queens Park, and Highwood moving to Ward 7, and Edgemont and Country Hills moving to Ward 4, you can see some correlation when you look at a map. Why we would separate Country Hills from the rest of the Northern Hills? To me, this seemed a little odd. Also adding Edgemont to the fold changed the geography a little. They are isolated from the rest of ward 4 by Nose Hill Park.
Financial Accountability: Recently the city commented on the stale-mated growth of the city. One would hope the budget is based on real numbers of people and a tax base that can be calculated. If a budget is forecasted on growth potential and not the actual tax base, what is the new council left with when budget meetings roll around in November? We all know you can't borrow from operations to fund capital expenditures, but we need to be sure the city business continues to run. This means we have to take a look at all our operations to ensure we break even. Unlike a business, our shareholders are more interested in keeping their share cost low (taxes), but still keep all the existing, implement new, and improving on existing services to keep their city one of the best in Canada to live in.
Low Cost Housing: If the city can encourage developers to incorporate low cost housing to new residential areas, and keep the design and aura of the neighborhood that they had in mind, it will encourage new home OWNERS, which in turn creates a larger tax based to draw from. My idea of low cost housing is not in the form of Rentals. I think everyone deserves a chance to own their home.
Developer's participation in infrastructure: With each new community in the city, comes a need for new streets, new sewers, and additional services in the form of power, trash, recycling, and business development. I believe the developers should participate in the financing of city infrastructure. Is it fair for all taxpayers to pay for the new areas?
Business to Business: What am I going to do to make sure businesses stay in the core or at least in Calgary, and not leave for the suburbs of Okotoks, Airdrie, Strathmore, etc? This problem is two fold. The small cities on the outskirts of Calgary provide space and lower taxes to lure the businesses into a new home. In Calgary, property owners in the core can help with this dilemma. As much as there is a business tax base, we need to make sure the businesses are located in Calgary. Landlords do not want empty office towers. The onus lies on their doorstep to try and keep their occupancy rate low. The city can help, but I am not prepared to say how, as it is or could be considered a broken promise. I do think something could be done about parking in the core. Is there a reason that parking spots cost as much as a small apartment? And even the meters. You get a discount for the first hour, but have you ever tried to get anything done downtown in less than one hour? This one needs to be investigated. I sure hope that our meter rates aren't based on the implementation of Park Plus. Maybe once it has paid for itself they could lower the rates. After all, the BC Government did remove the Toll Booth on the Coquihalla.
Transit: It seems to me that we need to evaluate how transit operates at rush hour. I know they try, as you see three route 301 busses packed to the rim go by the bus loop at 78th every morning. We want people to ride the bus, but must make it work for all. Is it fair that a Crowfoot train is full at McMahon. four car trains are coming, but when? Staggered starts may be an option, and this may already be happening. As for transit rates, to me, they seem fair. I was paying $2.75 in greater Vancouver 15 years ago. We also need to figure a way to operate for people in communities. For me to get from Huntington to Edgemont, I need to take 3 busses. Circle routes have some balance, but when all main routes operate on a straight line through the city, as the city grows, getting from A to B requires thought and great timing. Transit also has an affect on our schools. The express busses that make one run in the morning, immediately switch to a district school run, and then after school operate in reverse. I do not have the ultimate solution, but it is on my Radar.
Recycling/Trash: When the city wide recycling program started, the first 3 weeks, my blue bin was packed. I saved it, knowing it was coming. Now with the program established, I never fill the bin in a week. We could realize some cost savings in this department one of two ways. Change the schedule to a 7 business day rotation. Also, as each resident has to insure the bin is properly placed in the alleys and on the streets, would it not make sense to have them all on one side of the street. This would save driver time; in they would not have to go down the same streets twice. I know that I would not have a problem moving my bin across the alley if it meant the costs of the program were lowered. As for trash, I have yet to fill my bin on a weekly basis. When this program is fully functional city wide, I will have no problem buying a tag for my excess garbage. Grass clippings and leaves are the biggest space takers in garbage scenario. I imagine, as with recycling, the compost program will also eventually return to our ward / city.
The $60 Million Budget shortfall: New council will have their hands full with this one - if all programs, and business units are to get the same treatment as CPS (which I agreed with), then each unit will need to evaluate all aspects of their business. With this in mind, key services, such as the Fire Department and Calgary Police Services I foresee their budget request being approved if they are reasonable. As the city grows the needs for these services grows. This means recruitment, equipment, and other capital expenditures associated with their infrastructure. If we (the new council) are not blindsided by the previous administration, then all should move forward. Is 6% increase in taxes unreasonable - it is, and it is threatened every year? They cut, chop, snip, and eventually lower it to a more workable figure. Is the 6% just a scare tactic, so that when the real increase is announced, it is accepted?
More later - Have a great Day !
Tuesday, August 3, 2010
Graffiti and your views – related? I think so.
Travelling around the community this past week, mostly by car, with a little walking, I had a chance to observe a change in the scenery. It seems that Graffiti is taking over Huntington. I look at schools, sign posts, garages, postal boxes, street signs, and even a truck driving down the street. I am very disappointed – and a lot angered!
It seems to be out of control. Unless the community, including CPS can be everywhere all the time after dark, how can we solve this problem? Is it Kids / Teens / Adults? If they actually have Artistic Talent, can we not try to get it on canvas, instead of school walls? Is it due to summer months and people having nothing constructive to do?
A solution - For people living across the street from targets, face your webcam across the street – set it to 5 second intervals and in the morning, review the movie. Five second intervals will result in 7200 frames over a 10-hour period. Once you have your movie, you may be able to benefit from Crime Stoppers payments? Do we need a paint can registry? The logistics of this are insane, so not practical.
How is this – Let’s use solar technology, and light the school grounds and parks. Now, I am not an expert on the up front cost, but I think, if the lights erected operate on Solar energy, eventually, replacement cost is bulbs. Take this one step further, and let’s light up all the “Flood Rinks” in the city so families can actually skate in the winter… I know you all hate it when to leave for work in the dark, and hate it more when you get home after work, and it is dark. We have Chinooks in the winter… we can use these parks, provided we can see them.
Back to Graffiti – I think that anyone caught, charged, and convicted for Graffiti or Vandalism, should have mandatory clean up in their Community Service requirements. This would of course be funded by the Artist.
Unfortunately, if you personally are a victim of graffiti, Calgary Bylaw says you have 14 days to remove it. If you need assistance, help is available with a pilot project starting Aug 9, 2010, and running until November 26 – or until funds run out.
Here is a link to the City website with information regarding Private Graffiti.
Private Graffiti Abatement Program
In the interim, if you see suspicious activity around your neighborhood, please feel free to call Calgary Police Service non-emergency line @ 403-266-1234.
The reason I talk about the Graffiti in the neighborhood, is basically engagement. Part of my platform (as it is called), is community engagement, and empowerment with government. I would love it if everyone who saw suspicious activity, took the 3-5 minutes to call CPS. Unfortunately, unless the suspicious activity has a direct impact on themselves or their property, it goes un-reported.
After elected, any issue that is coming up for a vote in City Hall, will be available for comment in some sort of forum. It may be a blog, it may be via e-mail to the alderman, or it may be in the form of a phone call. I want, and need, all the input of the community to make the right decision. Now, on that note, there may be issues where opinion is split, or alternate proposals make more sense. I am willing to listen to all. If it is an issue that is close to your heart, but not your neighbors, I still want to know. After all, this is all about making our community better. And our community, eventually branches out to our city.
Travelling around the community this past week, mostly by car, with a little walking, I had a chance to observe a change in the scenery. It seems that Graffiti is taking over Huntington. I look at schools, sign posts, garages, postal boxes, street signs, and even a truck driving down the street. I am very disappointed – and a lot angered!
It seems to be out of control. Unless the community, including CPS can be everywhere all the time after dark, how can we solve this problem? Is it Kids / Teens / Adults? If they actually have Artistic Talent, can we not try to get it on canvas, instead of school walls? Is it due to summer months and people having nothing constructive to do?
A solution - For people living across the street from targets, face your webcam across the street – set it to 5 second intervals and in the morning, review the movie. Five second intervals will result in 7200 frames over a 10-hour period. Once you have your movie, you may be able to benefit from Crime Stoppers payments? Do we need a paint can registry? The logistics of this are insane, so not practical.
How is this – Let’s use solar technology, and light the school grounds and parks. Now, I am not an expert on the up front cost, but I think, if the lights erected operate on Solar energy, eventually, replacement cost is bulbs. Take this one step further, and let’s light up all the “Flood Rinks” in the city so families can actually skate in the winter… I know you all hate it when to leave for work in the dark, and hate it more when you get home after work, and it is dark. We have Chinooks in the winter… we can use these parks, provided we can see them.
Back to Graffiti – I think that anyone caught, charged, and convicted for Graffiti or Vandalism, should have mandatory clean up in their Community Service requirements. This would of course be funded by the Artist.
Unfortunately, if you personally are a victim of graffiti, Calgary Bylaw says you have 14 days to remove it. If you need assistance, help is available with a pilot project starting Aug 9, 2010, and running until November 26 – or until funds run out.
Here is a link to the City website with information regarding Private Graffiti.
Private Graffiti Abatement Program
In the interim, if you see suspicious activity around your neighborhood, please feel free to call Calgary Police Service non-emergency line @ 403-266-1234.
The reason I talk about the Graffiti in the neighborhood, is basically engagement. Part of my platform (as it is called), is community engagement, and empowerment with government. I would love it if everyone who saw suspicious activity, took the 3-5 minutes to call CPS. Unfortunately, unless the suspicious activity has a direct impact on themselves or their property, it goes un-reported.
After elected, any issue that is coming up for a vote in City Hall, will be available for comment in some sort of forum. It may be a blog, it may be via e-mail to the alderman, or it may be in the form of a phone call. I want, and need, all the input of the community to make the right decision. Now, on that note, there may be issues where opinion is split, or alternate proposals make more sense. I am willing to listen to all. If it is an issue that is close to your heart, but not your neighbors, I still want to know. After all, this is all about making our community better. And our community, eventually branches out to our city.
Friday, July 23, 2010
Cars, People, Bikes, and Tunnels!
Today’s Blog; is a rant – I guess. On one of the blogs I subscribe to, they mentioned my name and traffic. Therefore, I will adhere to the statement, so I can live up to its accuracy.
Is traffic really an issue in Ward 4? Some residents seem to believe a large part of their traffic issues are the “Car Traps” (Why do some people call them Bus Traps?) if you live on the other side of the Car Trap at the top of Centre Street, or are separated from your friends in North Haven by another, consider this; the Car Trap’s sole purpose is to prevent traffic from short cutting through neighborhoods in which they are built. I am sure that even the people coming from the North to their Centre Street home, really do not mind them.
It’s all in Interest of time.
It seems that any time someone is late for an appointment; their reasoning is that traffic was murder. In this city, East/West commuting is a nightmare especially during the proverbial rush hour. Also during these pre-defined times, we have Deerfoot Trail. It has short merge lanes, and longer exit lineups. This makes it a “Gauntlet”. Why does this city need to put signs up that say in times of congestion, please be courteous. I guess if it wasn’t there, people would never get from Deerfoot to Blackfoot. Everyone is in a hurry, and I know time is always a factor. I leave for work at 6:30-7:00 and it takes 20 minutes to drive downtown. If I leave at 7:15 – commuterville kicks in, and I am not there until 8:00. Try this one day – leave for work 15 minutes earlier. You may be surprised…
As everyone in this city is in a hurry, I am sorry. I am the old clunker van in front of you, doing the speed limit, because I am not late. Now occasionally, when I find myself late, it is no reason for me to take my mistake out on the drivers around me.
I am a firm believer that Traffic Lights are for cars, and Crosswalk signals are for pedestrians. Now with that in mind, the road would be a safer place, and in downtown Calgary, people would be allowed to turn when given permission to do so by stopping the Pedestrians. You all know how that is done. The light changes from a white stick man to a RED FLASHING HAND. The pedestrian is watching the traffic signals instead, hence, do not obey the sign.. Bikers on the other hand, are apt to be both. They have the same rights as a driver to the road, they can ride on green, stop on red, etc. Except of course when they decide being a pedestrian is faster. Unfortunately, when they are on the sidewalk, they aren’t walking their bikes.
Traffic in Ward 4 – I am sure Country Hills Boulevard, one day, will not have construction somewhere. I am confident that the Shaganappi Interchange on Stoney trail could be complete by the fall. I believe that for the most part, transit works (I’ll talk about that one later). The car traps will most likely be there to stay. But, if you want to see the lions jump – let’s propose a tunnel through Nose Hill – I only suggest that, as Edgemont is now Part of Ward 4… My babysitters always seemed to live in Edgemont – It would just make it so much easier for me to get over to visit the constituents. I am of course kidding... But that Airport Tunnel – Where there’s a will, there’s a way, and I hope by November it’s not too late.
Drive safe, walk cautious, and always be aware of your surroundings… Until next time.
Is traffic really an issue in Ward 4? Some residents seem to believe a large part of their traffic issues are the “Car Traps” (Why do some people call them Bus Traps?) if you live on the other side of the Car Trap at the top of Centre Street, or are separated from your friends in North Haven by another, consider this; the Car Trap’s sole purpose is to prevent traffic from short cutting through neighborhoods in which they are built. I am sure that even the people coming from the North to their Centre Street home, really do not mind them.
It’s all in Interest of time.
It seems that any time someone is late for an appointment; their reasoning is that traffic was murder. In this city, East/West commuting is a nightmare especially during the proverbial rush hour. Also during these pre-defined times, we have Deerfoot Trail. It has short merge lanes, and longer exit lineups. This makes it a “Gauntlet”. Why does this city need to put signs up that say in times of congestion, please be courteous. I guess if it wasn’t there, people would never get from Deerfoot to Blackfoot. Everyone is in a hurry, and I know time is always a factor. I leave for work at 6:30-7:00 and it takes 20 minutes to drive downtown. If I leave at 7:15 – commuterville kicks in, and I am not there until 8:00. Try this one day – leave for work 15 minutes earlier. You may be surprised…
As everyone in this city is in a hurry, I am sorry. I am the old clunker van in front of you, doing the speed limit, because I am not late. Now occasionally, when I find myself late, it is no reason for me to take my mistake out on the drivers around me.
I am a firm believer that Traffic Lights are for cars, and Crosswalk signals are for pedestrians. Now with that in mind, the road would be a safer place, and in downtown Calgary, people would be allowed to turn when given permission to do so by stopping the Pedestrians. You all know how that is done. The light changes from a white stick man to a RED FLASHING HAND. The pedestrian is watching the traffic signals instead, hence, do not obey the sign.. Bikers on the other hand, are apt to be both. They have the same rights as a driver to the road, they can ride on green, stop on red, etc. Except of course when they decide being a pedestrian is faster. Unfortunately, when they are on the sidewalk, they aren’t walking their bikes.
Traffic in Ward 4 – I am sure Country Hills Boulevard, one day, will not have construction somewhere. I am confident that the Shaganappi Interchange on Stoney trail could be complete by the fall. I believe that for the most part, transit works (I’ll talk about that one later). The car traps will most likely be there to stay. But, if you want to see the lions jump – let’s propose a tunnel through Nose Hill – I only suggest that, as Edgemont is now Part of Ward 4… My babysitters always seemed to live in Edgemont – It would just make it so much easier for me to get over to visit the constituents. I am of course kidding... But that Airport Tunnel – Where there’s a will, there’s a way, and I hope by November it’s not too late.
Drive safe, walk cautious, and always be aware of your surroundings… Until next time.
Wednesday, July 21, 2010
Police Budget / Ramifications
City council on Monday, approved part of the Calgary Police Service budget, on that all current and new Police officer related items will go through. They then qualified it by asking that they make other cuts. In the business world, when a budget is submitted for apporoval, Managent will say OK, or please do more evaluation. As the preliminary budget is approved, we as new Alderman, will have to deal with the other departments concerns. Today, the Fire Department said they will be cancelling new recruit classes, and when they submit their budget, they will blame shortfalls on CPS and their approval.
I am sure that council will consider all budgets equally, and as long as everything is within reason, then budgets will be approved.
There are areas of City hall that all need to be fiscally responsible. For any avenue where revenue is part of the budget, then I believe that this could be used to offset all aspects of spending.
If there is a tax base that is related to spending, then these areas must be carefully scrutinized to ensure a balanced budget. Should the demands out weigh the income, then cuts may be necessary. These should be evaluated on a case by case basis.
It is extremely interesting that citizens comment immediately in favor of budgets related to Police services, as well as the fire department. But when city hall calls for a tax increase, every one is up in arms as to why.
BTW - I am also in that same group. I want to insure the taxes I pay are relevant, and related to my community. CPS, to me could be a revenue generating department within Calgary - unfortunately, the income revenue comes from everyone... This time, instead of taxes, they are fines. (But CPS does not have a quota.... do they?) Should CPS become revenu generating another "Citizen Term" comes to mind - Does Cash Cow ring a bell?
I am sure that council will consider all budgets equally, and as long as everything is within reason, then budgets will be approved.
There are areas of City hall that all need to be fiscally responsible. For any avenue where revenue is part of the budget, then I believe that this could be used to offset all aspects of spending.
If there is a tax base that is related to spending, then these areas must be carefully scrutinized to ensure a balanced budget. Should the demands out weigh the income, then cuts may be necessary. These should be evaluated on a case by case basis.
It is extremely interesting that citizens comment immediately in favor of budgets related to Police services, as well as the fire department. But when city hall calls for a tax increase, every one is up in arms as to why.
BTW - I am also in that same group. I want to insure the taxes I pay are relevant, and related to my community. CPS, to me could be a revenue generating department within Calgary - unfortunately, the income revenue comes from everyone... This time, instead of taxes, they are fines. (But CPS does not have a quota.... do they?) Should CPS become revenu generating another "Citizen Term" comes to mind - Does Cash Cow ring a bell?
Tuesday, July 20, 2010
Last Night in the News
Well, it appears that the Barlow Tunnel will not be happening under the current regime. I hope that all the options were apprpriately scrutinized, and the new faces of City hall aren't slam dunked in November - With all the recent spending, this issue is sure to be a hot topic come November.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)